IPA has had a plugin-based migration for remote LDAP servers since version 2.0.0. It will only migrate users and groups.
It has some powerful capabilities for working around eccentricities in the remote server including:
it is idempotent
support for both RFC2307 and 2307bis
support for ignoring specified objectclasses and attributes
allows excluding some users and/or groups
flexibility in the remote DIT, e.g. specifying user/group containers
This is insufficient for the following reasons:
It severely limits IPA-to-IPA migration as all other entry types are lost
User-private groups are not maintained
Syntax errors can cause migration to fail with the only resolution being to skip broken entries or fix the remote LDAP server
It is executed as a server-side plugin and if it runs long enough the client may disconnect
There is no feedback during the migration beyond watching the logs
There is no migration-specific log
The basic operation includes:
loop through the remote user and group containers examining each entry
if it looks like a user or group (based on objectclass) try to migrate it
convert group membership from the detected or provided RFC
retain passwords if the provider LDAP bind user can read them
drop conflicting attributes (like kerberos)
skip duplicates so it can be rerun multiple times
convert groups to IPA POSIX groups
There are two use-cases driving a re-implementation (or extension) of migration:
Addressing bugs in current LDAP-only migration code
Adding IPA-to-IPA migration including all entry types.
LDAP stores information in a tree structure known as the Directory Information Tree (DIT). Each node in the tree is an entry and each entry contains information in an attribute=value form. It is a very different storage model than a relational database as there is no “join” capability between entries (among other things).
The organization of the entries depends on schema which defines which object types (objectclasses) and attributes (attributetypes) are allowed. https://ldap.com/ has a pretty decent introduction to LDAP, schemas, etc. The important thing to understand is that in order for an attribute to be in an entry, there must be a corresponding objectclass which allows it, either as a MUST or MAY. The schema defines a syntax for that attribute which defines what type of data may be stored in it. Some LDAP servers do a better job than others at enforcing this syntax.
pure LDAP migration¶
While it is easy to see a remote LDAP migration as a subset of IPA to IPA it is better to keep them as separate for the following reasons:
It represents a small subset of a typical IPA installation: only users and groups.
The remote schema and DIT are unknown and different for each migration so it will require more care.
The quality of the data is unknown. 389-ds, used by IPA, enforces proper syntax where other servers may not.
IPA to IPA migration¶
For an IPA to IPA migration it is possible to make certain assumptions that aren’t possible in a pure LDAP migration including:
The DIT is understood and consistent
Unique UID/GID/login/group name(s) so additional checking is not necessary
A consistent schema (perhaps variability for users and groups)
IPA to IPA migration¶
It would be risky to hardcode the data to pull in. It is far simpler to iterate the things you don’t want to migrate. This should also improve the chances for future-proofing and preventing bugs like not migrating some new feature area. It will require that versions only migrate up or sideways and not backwards.
IPA-to-IPA migration will be implemented as an AdminTool standalone client.
A migration should only be done to a single IPA server. This will greatly simplify certain things, particularly performance. We may want an option to allow this and deny it by default.
If DNS is enabled on the remote server it will need to be enabled in the local one in order to migrate DNS data. It would need to be determined if the DNS DIT exists in a migrated server would allow bind to be configured (I suspect it will) but we don’t want to get into a situation where the migrated DNS data is unusable.
It will be optional to retain the same REALM and domain. This will make the use-cases of staging and development server migration possible.
This is TBD. I don’t know of a reason why a user wouldn’t want to retain the ranges as it would affect owned files, etc, but someone may want to make a clean break. I don’t believe it would be difficult to deal with as we would just set the magic values for DNA generation.
In order to retain the range then the remote and local ranges would need to be compared and the migration rejected if they do not overlap (perhaps allowed with –force).
As for DNA, if the range remains some effort will need to be made to set the local DNS configuration to match what is available remotely.
This may not be ideal. The basic process would be:
connect to all servers in the remote IPA installation
collect the DNA and on-deck ranges
determine the starting point
set the local DNA range to this starting point + the range end - 1
This could well leave huge holes of allocated values within the range but the DNA plugin should be able to handle that.
subids TBD. It may be fine to just straight migrate the range and records.
Discovery of IPA objects¶
The objects to migrate can be determined by examining the local API. It can be iterated to discover the available class objects which contain the container_dn and other useful information. Not all objects need to be migrated either because they are internal objects, represent schema or represent commands that have no underlying storage. Initialize the API and iterate over Object:
api.bootstrap(in_server=True, context='migrate') api.finalize() for obj in api.Object: work()
This gives us an alphabetized list of objects. An implicit relationship
can be determined by examining the member* values in
if it is present.
Using this list we know which are “leaf” entries which have no dependencies. These are migrated first. Then the list is iterated again looking for those with dependencies that are already satisfied and those are migrated. And so on.
So for example users and hosts are migrated. Then groups, which has a dependency on users. Then hostgroups can then be migrated.
Some objects, like hostgroups, can be nested. These will need to be deferred until all of their members are added. If a running list of objects that have been migrated is maintained then it can be easily calculated which are ready for migration and which are not without having to refer to LDAP.
Objects to ignore¶
The IPA API object list includes an number of internal-only objects and some classes that represent informational commands so they can be skipped for migration.
migration not needed
Each DNS record type is represented as a separate class. It is probably safe to just bulk import all dns records as there isn’t any IPA-specific information in them.
So basically add them to the ignore list.
Not all data in IPA can be manipulated with the API.
cn=certificates,cn=ipa,cn=etc,$SUFFIX contains any user-provided certificates. I think we can skip this and require that any necessary certificates be re-added. Otherwise, to be safe, we should validatate the trust and expiration dates on all of them.
DNA ranges. Depending on the local ranges we could try to recover them.
Items to NOT be migrated¶
We will not have migrate existing keys from the remote IPA server so the following will not be migrated:
Self-signed CA certificates (maybe we import user-added CA certs)
Basically anything in Custodia
Migrating conflicting data¶
For new entries (users, groups, hosts, etc) we can do a straight LDAP ADD after massaging necessary attributes (see Attributes to not migrate).
That is the easy part.
There are some parts of IPA that are default and will exist in both servers such as the configuration (config commands), allow_all HBAC rule, permissions, privileges, roles, selinux mappings, ipaservers hostgroup and more.
The strategy for this will be use the existing entry comparison in ldap2 and modify the new IPA instation to match the original minus some specific things like the CA subject base in the config. So in most cases we favor the remote IPA installation except for things which are installation-dependent.
The downside of this is that it could interpret “fresher” defaults in the new IPA server with stale ones from the old. We will need good logging around these types of entries.
Standard boilerplate will not be evaluated, things like cosTemplates. These are not user-modifiable and if a user decides to mess with them, they can correct it after migration.
A number of plugins are optional in IPA: nis, compat, ACME.
These will be enabled in the new IPA server if enabled in the remote at the end of migration:
cn=Schema Compatibility, cn=plugins, cn=config
cn=NIS Server, cn=plugins, cn=config
Schema compatibility will be disabled during migration as it can cause performance issues and we don’t want to try to migrate anything in cn=compat since it is generated data.
ACME is a feature of the CA. We should be able to import ipa_acme_manage and call enable/disable within the migration if it is remotely enabled.
Configuration to not migrate¶
These will not be migrated:
Winsync configuration (though the entries will)
cn=kerberos contains the Kerberos master key as well as the default ticket policy. Only the policy can be migrated.
Attributes to not migrate¶
Some attributes we will need to completely drop because they contain key or server-specific information for the remote IPA server. This may also include objectClasses that may need to be dropped if the last attribute is removed.
krbPrincipalKey (will require dropping objectclasses)
memberOf (will be reconstructed after the migration)
userCertificate if issued by the remote IPA server
Attributes to update to new REALM¶
If a REALM change is part of migration then these will need to be updated to reflect the new installation.
Attributes to change basedn¶
Prior to writing a new value any DN syntax attributes will need to be examined to see if they contain the remote baseDN if it is different. If so then the following need to be updated:
Migrating custom schema¶
Schema is stored in LDAP so we should be able to use our ldap library to discover differences. We probably want to do only ADD and bail if we determine something will be a MOD or DEL.
Excluding specific entries¶
The ignore user/group options of migrate-ds were introduced so that non-compliant entries could be skipped to not block the migration. We can ignore these for now.
Some benefits would be likely if common entry types were added in batches rather than individually. This would not easily allow for a “stop on failure” approach but could be considerably faster.
The basic idea is that added entries of the same type (user, group, etc) would be accumulated and added together. The result would be iterated through and logged.
The memberOf plugin should be disabled. A fixup task can be run post-migration to calculate the memberships.
The migrate-ds plugin manages idempotency because it skips over entries that already have been migrated (or exist). This new migration will handle it by merging the remote and local entries. This may not be desirable in all cases.
A simplistic view of the steps
Set migration mode=True Disable compat Disable memberof Migrate schema Loop through the list of remote objects:
fix up any DN values or other syntaxes
remove conflicting attributes/objectclasses
write new entry
if entry already exists, merge them if possible preferring remote side Enable memberOf Create memberOf fixup task Enable compat Restart world Run ipa-server-upgrade
pure LDAP migration¶
The current code generally works minus a few bugs and RFEs, some of which are resolved by doing an IPA-to-IPA migration instead. It should be maintained for now and migrated to the standalone client in the future.
These bugs should be considered for the existing plugin.
https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/3096 - error when migrating unknown schema
https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/3100 - Check for userPassword in migration
https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/4738 - [RFE] ipa migrate-ds should provide option for creating UPG from posixGroup objectClass
https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/5020 - migrate-ds: does not show migrated users if an error happened during group migration
https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/5693 - Passwords become “expired” when migrating from directory server to IPA
https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/6105 - migrate-ds is not completely ignoring attributes.
https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/6360 - ipa migrate-ds does not rename uniquemember/member attributes properly
https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/6380 - ipa migrate-ds should print warning for referrals
https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/7368 - ipa migrate-ds converts groupofuniquenames objects to groupofnames, but leaves groupofuniquenames objectclass present
ipa migrate-dsfails to migrate user and group data from directory server to IDM.
By default the log file will be /var/log/ipa-migrate.log and will be appended to and not overwritten. This is so it can reflect multiple runs if they are required.
At least the DN of all entries written should be logged (pkey may be sufficient).
Logging by object type could be handy and should natural since this is how the objects will be sorted.
DEBUG logging may want to show gory details, particularly when merging entries.
The command will be named ipa-migrate. It must determine whether the remote server is actually an IPA server or not. ipaclient/discovery.py::ipacheckldap may be re-usable.
The standalone client should use a unique context, migration. This will allow for a separate configuration file.
No UI option will be provided. This is command-line client only.
Overview of the CLI commands.
IPA to IPA¶
Advance knowledge of the DIT substantially reduces the number of options necessary for migration.
try the migration without writing data
ignore errors and keep going
version of the tool
output only errors
log to the given file
The DM password will be prompted for interactively.
Will remain unchanged unless one of the bug fixes requires it (perhaps for the UPG ticket).
There are currently no tests for migration.
Some simplisitic approaches for starting testing might include:
Count the number of entries that will be migrated and ensure they were migrated, by type (hosts, groups, etc).
Verify that the services enabled on the remote side are enabled after migration (NIS, ACME, etc).
Double-check, perhaps spot-checking, memberOf
Migrate a password to ensure it was imported properly
We have a data generation script in freeipa-tools that may be leveraged to generate the data but it currently generates a LOT of entries which is likely too much for automation.
Troubleshooting and debugging¶
Include as much information as possible that would help troubleshooting:
Does the feature rely on existing files (keytabs, config file…)
Does the feature produce logs? in a file or in the journal?
Does the feature create/rely on LDAP entries?
How to enable debug logs?
When the feature doesn’t work, is it possible to diagnose which step failed? Are there intermediate steps that produce logs?
We may eventually want to add the ability to skip entire types of data. For example, drop all sudo rules.